In an article at thelibertydaily.com it is reported:
But while the Democrat operatives in the fake news media are hammering pro-choice vaccine advocates like Buffalo Bills wide receiver Cole Beasley for refusing to take the experimental “vaccine,” NBC Sports reported today that all four of the Dallas Cowboys who’ve just tested positive for Covid are . . . wait for it . . . “fully vaccinated”:
The Cowboys announced Saturday that their player vaccination rate is 93 percent. They have four players and defensive coordinator Dan Quinn in COVID-19 protocol, but Quinn, Carlos Watkins and CeeDee Lamb, all of whom tested positive, are fully vaccinated, Calvin Watkins of the Dallas Morning News reports.
The article goes on to state:
In fact, earlier this month the NFL Players Association announced that nearly half of all infected individuals in the league (32 out of 65) were “vaccinated individuals,” meaning the Cowboys’ situation is not an anomaly.
One certainly has to wonder then about the efficacy of “the jab”.
Two questions raised in the article certainly deserve discussion, but don’t expect Twitter, FB or the msm (You know, scientists all) to ask them or even allow discussion because we are living with censorship:
This raises several questions:
-
- Why are we treating these so-called vaccines any differently than past vaccines, you know, the one-and-done types that actually worked? For example, if a high number of people who took the polio vaccine developed polio, we would be questioning its efficacy. In fact, it would be banned.
- Why are the NFL, owners, and coaches pressuring players to get the vaccine that is obviously not protecting them in any significant way?
2setsofrules believes that if you put “political science” on one side of a scale and “science” on the other side of a scale in the process of the FDA approving the Pfizer jab, that political science would out weigh science.
But we will never know – because again, we are living in an age of censorship.